Accuity: Treating ‘DysPEPsia’

Diagnosing the problem

Politically Exposed Persons, or PEPs, have been a topic of interest for many years and the term has been written into multiple pieces of compliance legislation in various countries. Yet there is still no single global definition of a PEP. In fact, the guidelines provided by governmental and regulatory bodies can be infuriatingly ambiguous. This is contrary to many other aspects of customer due diligence which seem straightforward in comparison – such as applying risk

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact [email protected] or view our subscription options here:

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact [email protected] to find out more.

To continue reading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a RiskTech Forum account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here: